May 17th, 2:35pm 0 comments

A Case Study in the Politics of Education

I wanted to explore the issue of the Politics of Education by looking at the battle over student assignment plans in Wake County Schools.  I think this movie demonstrates the influence of multiple "players" in the battle over education policy. 
Filed under Riddle video
Posted
May 13th, 7:36pm 0 comments

The House That Little Johnnie Built

(download)

This is a video I created for my Politics of Education class at VCU. The video highlights how each different level of government has an agenda for education, but the different forms of government do not necessarily work together to form what works best for the students to achieve in school. For my motivation, I envisioned the politics of education from the eyes of the main persons affected, the children. I thought of how the voices of children are seldom heard in the decisions made on their behalf and of how there are so many facets involved from so many different arenas. Additionally, in attempting to create a story of single purpose, I realized this process was so difficult for me because the different levels afffecting education politics do not operate with single purpose. Instead, they are actually disconnected. I came up with the final idea of wondering how much would change for the good if education politics involved all the pieces coming together for a single purpose for the common good. In other words, I began to imagine the powerful vision of having one big house working to have great impact instead of many different houses serving to follow and fulfill their own agendas! So, come along, view the video, and see "The House That Little Johnnie Built".
- Winston
Filed under Winston video
Posted
May 12th, 11:10am 0 comments

Love To Change

(download)

Throughout the course, the expansiveness of the educational system became more and more apparent. With so many spokes in the wheel, I realized that ultimately the student/teacher relationship is the ultimate key to moving towards change. There is a fear and an apprehension as teachers, to share ourselves completely and authentically to our students, but it is through showing the holistic, complete self to the children, that they can respect, learn and be loved. When a student is respected and loved, they open themselves to becoming compassionate citizens. This should be the focus of our educational process...creating compassionate, loving beings for nothing can be changed through negativity - only through love.

Posted by justv1c
May 10th, 6:20pm 0 comments

Hard to Believe

Well fellow classmates, it's hard to believe it's over. It's also hard to believe how much I learned in this class! I definitely didn't know what to expect coming into the class, but I can definitely say I stretched beyond my expectations. Thanks, Dr. Becker, for giving me the room and space to experiment and the time to tinker. I learned through this class that I don't have to be afraid of tinkering (as I was quite afraid I'd mess up my computer or my product before the class). Tinkering really paid off, and I was able to create a digital story about which my family, friends, and I are still talking. I can't wait to use Moviemaker again, and I talk all the time of all the tools we used in class.  I found this class to be self-fulfilling as well as a means to relate to my fellow classmates more and on a deeper level! Well, kudos to each of you for doing such a great job on the final presentation and finishing the class with such class!
-Angela Winston
Posted
May 10th, 3:44pm 1 comment

Cheers!!!!!

I wanted to say Farewell to you all!!! This course has been such an eye opening experience and has allowed me room to grow beyond my expectations. Thank you Dr. Becker for your challenging yet greatly rewarding teaching methods. I wish each of you success in your future career of Education Leadership. Best Wishes!!

Never Live without Laughing and always Love as if its your last time!!

 

~Georgetta a.k.a MSW Candidate!!!

April 24th, 6:47pm 26 comments

How did *that* computer get into my classroom???

I've been fortunate enough to visit many, many classrooms across the United States. I've been to classrooms in the biggest city school districts (I still marvel over how far I had to drive to get from on school in the Dallas Independent School District to another) and classrooms in the most remote rural areas (I still don't know how to pronounce Gnadenhutten, OH, but I spent a day in a school there). The communities served by the schools I've visited vary in some incredible ways. The look and feel of the schools vary much less so. If you've never seen the Mr. Winkle Wakes video, here's your chance.

So, the image at the bottom of this post could be from most classrooms in most schools in Anytown, USA. That is, if there are any desktop computers in the classroom, there may be 1-5 "workstations" which mostly collect dust. If they're being used at all, it's usually for students "typing up papers," "finding something on the Internet," or "doing extra work in reward for completing the 'other' assignment early."

Nearly without fail, when I ask teachers how that computer (or those computers) got into their classroom, they have no idea. I usually hear something like, "Oh, I don't know...they were here when I was assigned this room." 

But, those computers did not magically appear in that classroom. A series of decisions led to the computer(s) in the classroom.

That series of decisions becomes a great "case" for us to examine the politics of education in toto. 

So, for a culminating discussion here in this space, let's collectively think through "the politics of educational technology." Think about the distribution of power and what might have happened at various levels of government. Think about how decisions were made about who gets what and how.

[NOTE: please try to keep this conversation within this post by using the comments section; i.e. don't start new posts...]

4806308336_d516063ec4_o

Photo credit

Filed under politics technology
April 23rd, 1:30pm 1 comment

Distributive Justice for All

As I continue to reflect on the whole idea of distributive justice in education, I have been thinking about how I would distribute resources. I do believe in doing things in the fairest way possible. If only there was that magic mirror that I could go to and ask, "Mirror, mirror on the wall, what's the fairest way of all". Then, I would get the best answer for the situation. When I realize that I have to look at the woman in the mirror in the end, the weight becomes really heavy on my shoulders. Believe me, learning about the whole distinction between Rawls and Novick was really an eye opener and definitely gave me something to sink my teeth into when trying to make a decision.  I think I have prioritzed my approach by choosing to use the Rawls approach first and then Novick. So, I find that I first use the Rawls approach and try to give value to things and distribute equally according to the area of most need. When that becomes a problem or if that is not easy, I resort to the Novick approach. For instance, when I had to decide how to give out cake and icecream at a birthday party, I first thought to give out equal pieces with each child telling me what icecream they wanted. Then, I thought the "birthday boy" should get whatever flavor he wanted, so I let him decide first. The next day, the goodies were distributed on a first come, first serve basis until all the icecream and cake were gone. Well, that was a somewhat ordinary/easy situation. With school, there are so many other variables to consider in order to place value. I see that most problems exist because there are limited resources and there is limited funding. As far as funding is concerned, money is power. With the way our education system is run, those with the most money have the most power in distribution. We try to keep this power in check by having equal votes and representation; however, even this checks and balances system is corrupted by lobbyists, unionists, selfish desires, etc. All in all, we just have to undersand that "people" are in charge and thus are susceptible to corruption. We have to either hope for the best or maybe allow more children (the real clients) get involved. Perhaps such sayings as "A child shall lead them" and "We need to see the world from the eyes of a [innocent] child" ring true in the world of education politics where power and justice collide.
-Angela Winston
Posted
April 19th, 10:50am 0 comments

Quote for Thought

"Finally you have to understand that more important than anything else is justice. The way we can turn the world around is if we are at least moving on a path toward justice. Maybe it can never be achieved in any pristine form. Right now, the coalition of the powerful elites across the world are making it very clear that they are not even interested in justice.” ~ Arundhati Roy

Filed under Howie Quotes justice
April 19th, 10:46am 0 comments

Future MSW view on Justice

When I hear the word Justice, my thoughts are centered on social justice and how to dissect in within the communities I serve. One of the many but simply put definitions defined by www.google.com for Justice is: the “quality of being just of fair”. My common knowledge of those within a community is most can not possess such a “quality of fairness”. I think it’s a unique characteristic of one’s character to be fair and just. I am certain we have all been on the receiving end or giving end of this “quality”.

Dr. Cornel West, a very inspiring, full of knowledge intellectual who I admire greatly, shares words through his passion to educate many on topics such as Justice. In a recent discussion about charity and justice West says: “what you have in society today, is a stress on pity as opposed to compassion, ending up with a stress on philanthropy versus a stress on Justice, genuine compassion and Justice is not about waiting…” He views Justice as the “systematic arrangement of power and resources”. The question to answer in most cases is if “this arrangement fair?” This statement put my thoughts and views into a streamline assessment and made me see things a bit clearer.

Is this not what we have been discussing this entire semester? Power, resources, education, Lack of, needing more, wanting more, lacking, influence, powerless.

I have a belief that schools have a responsibility to provide for its neediest children. In any setting, this should be the priority. If ever and whenever a system is created, it will not serve all youth the same. All youth are not the same and their issues vary. Educators in my opinions should possess the skill and be given the flexibility to assess each student and set a standard for each student and their achievement. Wouldn’t this be fair? Setting one standard and making it mandatory that students achieve according to that standard has not proven to be much of a success.

I previously posted an article about a woman in Ohio, Kelly Williams-Bolar, who used her father’s address so that her children could attend school in a different district. A woman, who was enrolled in school to be a teacher herself, was arrested. In an effort to get her children access to quality education, she was treated as a criminal and arrested. Where is the Justice? This action was just an action of love from a mother who wants the best for her children. I can not identify the Justice but the Injustice is obvious. Had all parents and children had resources and opportunities for education and free choice of schools to attend would this have been a crime? Equal, High Quality education is what ALL children should have. I think we should define what is Equal and High Quality in terms of Education and apply that standard. This is Justice!

April 17th, 7:10pm 3 comments

Distributive Justice in Ed Discussion

In line with our conversation with Gary Stager and the realization that this is a class war...

I really found the Nozick - Rawls summaries highly appropriate to our current situation. I think that in the current climate there is a real battle going on between these "arenas of thought" at both the macro and micro level. I have a challenging time finding a way to remain unbiased in this conversation. I see two visions of the human experience: one where Nozick's basic philosophy "wins" and wage slavery (adults "freely" consenting to enslavement [Nozick's words]) continues until those in power move beyond reach of the rest of humanity. I literally mean beyond our reach, e.g., space stations, the moon, new planets, or simply in James Bondesque locations and "secret lairs". 

However, I find that this is only true and will only be true if the general population does not sicken of this worldview and subsequent lifestyle - our consenting to slavery. As we can see around the globe right now, and even here in the states people are getting tired of worrying about their survival and that of their families--while a few live in unimaginable luxury. Currently, there is a lot of speculation between which robber baron, Bill Gates or Carlos Slim, will become the world's first trillionaire. It is this kind of abuse of other humans, this enslavement to the economic banking machine, that leads to revolution. The catch this time around in this age old battle is that we are globalized...and that means the next revolution will be felt far more broadly than ever before. 

One of the facts of this challenge is that the people (the masses) divided will continue to remain slaves--trapped in our ideologies and bickering among ourselves. We go to work each day because, we are immured in a system of consumerism in which we acquire debt (and pay interest on it) day in and day out for the rest of our lives as wage slaves. However, the people united are more powerful than any leader, party, banking cartel, resource cartel, government, army, military, etc. We ARE the army and the military. We are keeping these few people in their luxurious lifestyles. We think that if we are greedy enough, if we catch the right break, if we know the right people, if we are ruthless enough, or if by some freak chance we win the lottery that we too can be free. It is this mindset that keeps us enslaved because it means that we are trying to all be at the top of the economic pyramid. This economic ponzi scheme. But - that isn't how pyramids work. I do not know about the rest of you, but I am tired of building other people's pyramids. I'd like to just live a life where I can take care of myself, my family and my community. I can grow much of my own food, take care of my modest amount of stuff, and not have to worry about the banking system crashing our economic system again, (which I am nearly convinced is intentional). 

This seems to be Rawl's point to me. If we see ourselves as equals collectively as well as individually, then we wouldn't act to enslave others because that would endanger us or our families to also becoming slaves. If our thinking changes about these things, then our system will change as a natural result of our thinking. Until then, I think we will continue to create the same pyramid building system of government that as been going on since the rise of civilization.

So then as Vic, Steph and probably all of us are wondering - what are we to do? I think that the answer is inherent in Rawl's view. We are to free our minds from the cultural memes, the collective shackles that keep us bound to this system of pyramid building. As we are able to see what is really true: that there are many of us and we can choose to live as we would like to as long as we choose collectively, then things will begin to change. I see a lot of change in how people think. When a fruit vendor can begin a revolutionary movement that overthrew a dictator supported by the most powerful economic and military state that has ever existed...things are changing. 
Posted by mancastroppa